Envelope-to: charley@transocean.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:39:09 -0700
From: Liora Manne <liora@lioramanne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: An idea for Illusion
Message-Id: <8CA056AD-D977-4832-9EA1-6BEBC2B31BEE@lioramanne.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:44:07 -0400
To: Charley Peck <charley@transocean.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
 
 Content preview:  I think we may be able to take the Cads for the FP Easter
   Rugs and mechanically add the painterly texture to make the Illusion quality.
    This will take away the need to make the Lamontage. What do you think? Is
    there a problem with using same patterns for FP and Illusions? They would
    feel different because of the watercolor effect that will be created mechanically.
    [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-100.9 points, 3.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
  1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
                             anti-forgery methods
X-Spam-Flag: NO

I think we may be able to take the Cads for the FP Easter Rugs and =
mechanically add the painterly texture to make the  Illusion quality.
This will take away the need to make the Lamontage.  What do you think?=20=

Is there a problem with using same patterns for FP and Illusions?  They =
would feel different because of the watercolor effect that will be =
created mechanically.

We will have to play with the process -  I could talk to Ugur about the =
added texture in the morning.

What do you think? =20